A Photography Update
Posted: Jan 27, 2004
   
     

We have just passed the halfway point of our one year journey, and have become quite settled in our travel routine. This includes becoming quite intimate with our photographic and electronic gear, as we have now established a comfortable workflow to shoot, download, edit, and manage our digital pictures.

The equipment has worked out very well, for the most part. However, we have actually encountered a few snafus along the way, which have resulted in a few equipment changes and yes, some additional purchases.

First of all, the Canon 10D digital SLR camera has been an amazing tool, and I honestly feel that a beginner photographer like me is really not worthy of such a camera. If Canon had released their Digital Rebel (300D) before I had purchased the 10D, I would definitely have purchased that instead; the 10D has a whole slew of custom functions and additional functionality that I seldom use, if at all. Plus, the Digital Rebel uses the exact same CMOS sensor, and costs about half as much. However, having said that, I am extremely satisfied with this camera body, and would recommend it to anyone interested in taking photographs with a digital SLR. (If you don't know what an SLR is, then you don't really need to bore yourself with this column.)

We initially started off with two lenses, a 75-300mm and a 28-135mm IS. After our safaris in East Africa, I found that I wasn't using the long lens very much, and was sticking to the 28-135 IS as my main lens. I decided somewhere in Morocco that I'd send it back to Seattle when we met up with Scott and Rochelle in Malta . However, in late August, disaster struck while we were in Casablanca, when I permanently damaged the CMOS sensor in my 10D. Yes, just like the manual says not to do, I decided I would be smart and tried to brush away the dust specs that were on the sensor with the edge of my lens cloth. Well, just in case any other digital SLR owner is curious, yes, the sensor is as sensitive as they say it is. As soon as I saw the scratches on the sensor, I knew the camera was shot; you couldn't see much when shooting at f/5, but anything below f/11 displayed an ugly "Z" across the image. I was devastated. I still am in a way; I haven't been able to talk about it publicly for four months, I've been feeling so stupid.

Anyway, I researched the various options and after a flurry of e-mails with Canon Customer Service, determined that the only viable option was to send it back to the States to have it serviced. So, in addition to bringing a zoom lens back, Scott and Rochelle found themselves bringing a 10D body back with them as well. Actually, since I was sending things off to be repaired, I decided to see if Canon could get rid of this vibration that seemed to occur once in a while in my IS lens. So, Scott couriered the gear to Canon Factory Service Center in California, and I waited nervously to see if the repairs would be done by the time we returned to San Diego for Stacy's wedding four weeks later.

What this meant was that I was shooting with a damaged SLR throughout all of Tunisia and Malta, and that in Turkey, I was shooting with our "backup" camera, Jen's Powershot S400. Incidentally, Jen has reminded me to mention that the S400 has been an excellent camera, and we have taken many good photos with it. I couldn't agree more!

Click on this page to see an example of the CMOS scratch; if you look on the right side of the image you'll see a faint "Z" in the sky across the lightning bolt. You'll also notice that none of the Tunisia pictures taken with the 10D have been shot with an aperture smaller than f/5.6 (you can see the exposure details below each picture). Similarly, on the three Turkey pages you will notice that all the pictures were shot with the S400 (again, look below each picture). If anyone who has been following our trip noticed that the Turkey pictures were different from the others, let me know!

Anyway, when we did get to San Diego in October, the repaired body arrived at Stacy's place just two days after we arrived. However, they neglected to fix the lens, which meant that I wouldn't have anything to mount on the now-fixed 10D until Ray brought out the repaired 28-135mm IS to us when he met us in Nepal in November. Without hesitation, I went out and bought a cheap 50mm prime-I couldn't bear the thought of not being able to shoot anything in India with the 10D. At the same time, I picked up a sturdy table-top tripod; the Ultrapod 2 I was carrying just wasn't beefy enough to handle the combined weight of the 10D and a large lens. Incidentally, two days before his wedding, Stacy was taking me to photography stores in San Diego rather than getting things ready for his wedding; the wedding went fine, everything went off without a hitch.

So, check out all the pictures in India, and you might notice that all the 10D shots were taken with a 50mm fixed lens. Dave once told me that it was a good way to learn about composition, and it really was; I found myself zooming with my feet a whole lot for the three weeks in India ! Of course, since I knew that Ray was joining us in Nepal a few weeks later with the repaired 28-135mm IS, I thought it would be the ideal opportunity to bring out something that I really wanted, a wide-angle lens. So, I promptly ordered a 17-40mm f/4 L from B&H Photo, which arrived just two days before Ray left Seattle for Nepal . I knew it's a pretty slow lens, but I couldn't afford the fast stuff; the 10D repair job knocked me back a ton (if you REALLY want to know how much, contact me). Plus I thought for a piece of L glass, it was pretty reasonable.

So, all the shots from Nepal, Bhutan, Laos, Thailand, and Vietnam have been taken with my current lenses, the 28-135mm, and the 17-40mm. With luck, this will be the same gear I'll be using when we get home in six months. Why am I going into so much detail about this mess? Probably because I want to remind myself how much of a schmuck I was to touch the CMOS in the first place.

Incidentally, I also changed the camera bag that I was using; I originally was carrying around the camera and attached lens in a regular small zoom bag, and the additional lens and cards in my backpack. While transiting in Germany from San Diego to Bombay, I picked up a Crumpler photography combo backback, which has a bottom section that zips open to reveal a padded camera carrying section. It also has an inner padded flap that is designed to hold a laptop. Whenever we're in transit, I've got the camera and laptop in that bag, safe and secure, with me all the time.

 

Anyhow, as we have been moving along, I've been trying to take better pictures, as that was one of the goals of this trip, to develop some skills as a beginner photographer. I've found that there are two modes of shooting for me: tourist snapshot mode, and artsy photographer mode. Most of the time, I find myself in snapshot mode, happily taking quick shots of beautiful things without being disciplined to ask myself about composition, exposure, or what I message I want the photograph to convey. I suppose there's nothing wrong with that, but then I don't need a fancy camera to do that.

In the few occasions where I am thinking about those photography things, I find I am really taking my time with the camera, thinking about the lighting conditions, and waiting for quite some time for the right moment before pressing the shutter. In almost all these cases, the shots turn out reasonably well. Of course, the shots posted on the website are significantly reduced in quality for bandwidth purposes.

I mentioned workflow before, and that is now down to a smooth routine. Almost every day I download the latest shots onto the laptop into daily folders. Then I go through the approximately 120 shots per day on average that I shoot (not much by most amateur photographer standards), deleting anywhere between 40 and 80 of them; poor composition, lens flare, duplicates, etc. I then select the best of the remainder, and copy them into another directory named by country. By the end of a country's visit, I will have anywhere between 100 to 200 decent photos; from this pile I'll select a few for the web pages, and others for potential printing when we get home. A few of the better "artsy" photos don't make it to the website because they don't really have anything to do with the country we're visiting. The nightly process of selecting and deleting seldom takes more than 15 minutes; the only really time-consuming activity is in the captioning of the pictures whenever I am about to develop a country's web page-that usually takes an hour or two.

Speaking of which, working on this new laptop has been such a pleasure compared to our previous machine. Yes, if you haven't been reading our blogs, another change of gear involved our computer, the first of which went belly-up in Pokhara, Nepal . (We now have a Panasonic Toughbook T1 that Lisa and Simon brought to us in Thailand, which will hopefully withstand the bumps better than our Sony Vaio.) The boot sector on the hard drive became corrupt, and we weren't able to access the computer any more. Fortunately, we were able to save almost all the data, as almost everything was backed up to CD; there were three days of photos in Kathmandu that were irretrievable.

One of those missing photos raises a bit of a controversy when it comes to ethics and photography. It is a picture of a funeral pyre in Nepal that has just been lit, with the body of the deceased on top of it, covered in a bright orange cloth. Off to the side of the burning pyre is a relative of the deceased, who was earlier preparing the body and lighting the pyre, but is now squatting with his face in his hands, weeping in sorrow. We were all fascinated with the event, but many people, including myself, were struggling with whether or not to take pictures, feeling that it would be somewhat of an invasion of privacy. Some people did, some people didn't. And although I did, I know that I would be annoyed with bystanders taking pictures of my grandmother's funeral. However, when I looked at that photo, it was far and away the most powerful image I had taken in the previous five months. One look at it produced an immediate welling in my throat as I recalled the emotion of the moment-indeed, it is probably only these "controversial" photos that can produce such an emotional response. I think that a successful photo must generate some kind of a response, whether it is admiration, disgust, wonder, or interest. I'm still struggling with this one.

Less controversial, but still a challenging task for me for me is taking pictures of people, especially when they are uncomfortable with the camera. I still haven't gotten used to the social aspect of people photography, where you sometimes need to get in people's faces in order to capture a good shot. Some experienced National Photographic photographers have written about how they talk people up, share stories with their subjects, or use little tricks to get people to laugh; I still can't bring myself to do much more than smile and point at the camera, hoping for a positive response. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't; it's a barrier I will have to overcome if I want to get those really memorable face shots of strangers in strange lands.

Hopefully for the next six months I'll be able to tip the balance in favour of more quality photos rather than snapshots. At the same time, we want to document our trip as thoroughly as possible, at sometimes the things we do and see just aren't that photogenic but tell a good story. It will be interesting to re-read this column at the end of our trip and see how things turn out!

Special thanks to Scott and Rochelle for bringing all that gear back home from Malta and shipping the body to Canon; to Stacy for helping me with the 10D repair order and driving me around town looking for gear; to Ray, for hauling my new lens all the way to Nepal for us; and to Lisa and Simon for bringing our new laptop all the way to Thailand for us. Also thanks to Evelyn, Ken, Gunga, and Paul for all your help with getting the laptop configured.

   
     
     
 
< ALL COLUMNS >
   
   


© 2003-2004 Winston & Jennifer Yeung. All Rights Reserved.